.....
Te-
10.5". als
Your telegram of August 26
Inkun".
The Harbour Master, on
S. S.
434
being applied
to by the master
of the Vessel bombed and that as the men's agreement
did not disclose the nature of service
they cared not with whom they dealt for
amounted to refusal of duty. This
practically
there were
The
a reprisal of summary
further proceedings.
then referred to the
Attorney General who concurred generally
with the view
of
The Harbor Master,
adding that every
case arising
must be dealt with
on its own merits and
determined
inter alia
by the terms of the agreement under which the men shipped and
the nature of each
agreement itself.
Whether their endorsed
the
the action