the Stone Office
subsequent
Knutsford's
Lo
Are de op
of the
30th
Aberl
W90
or Individual.
2.
In reply
I have to refer
A
five desk of the
1619
Is
March 1878
thei
Länsmit
accompany wis
copy
of
Further
the
was
Subject which
last
year.
I have to
3.
the
One ral
and that
he mo
S
an Fatalilian
undy revision
1903 W let
previous Paper.
HO
24057
way enet vos cons 380. 23VAL
To reminded Jo. 8 Mch
12401
· (35) ~[65] ~2060{+21-2
subsequent Paper,
of
LONG KONG
No. 37414
(Subject.)
RECU
530
DOMESTIC.
C. O.
37414
Red 12 007 03)
Howard Stephens & Atty Pinl.
snats communication from Messrs Howard Stephens & Howard calls, he will be requested to communicate
i co
Mr Johan Sin
mtox
(Minutes.)
These people were given leave
to appeal to the Privy
Council
They
didn't prosecute the appeal and it was dismissed (16731/03)
(16731/03) They
petitioned H.M. for redress
of grace
19502
.
They then
as a
matter
JTM gave no directions.
now they are surprised and incl
calling here shortly.
As they petitioned the sof glas long ago
February 199
am
swin told that the Sof? would not interfere, I don't see what is to be gained by an
interview. But as
we don't known Mr Howard's addign