at Hong Kong if they
hat such leave is
W CALE
CMO,
are adiread
necessary, and that
proper for appeal upon
Differ
160
piction.
its regards the contention that
Ordinance
ions ultra vires this
ht to have been raised in the
+
hing Court, and may possibly be
raised of the Petitioners
are
wind that there is anything in
point,
J
mica.
to which d'express
On being properly
I before the Hong Kong Court
160
ring in due
be brought
before
495