The demurally sent

wring plan

As Sox

& crant it back

ponible Drafts submitted

314


ton this subject, please quote

DW D.VS 1446

And address letter to-

The Secretary,

Admiralty, Whitehall,

London, S.W.

3072


letter

of

asking

Admiralty,

april

11903.

331

16 APR 02

with further reference to your

the 11th November, 1901, Wo 42586/01,

to be

furnished with

a plan shewing

Staunton Kong

Suitable for

a Naval Reserve; &

commanded by the Lords Commissioner.

of the Admiralty to transmit for the information of the Secretary of State for

the Colonies, a

Long Harbour, which it is considered would be suitable for such

purpose.

(2) My Lords will accordingly be glad if

the Secretary of State for the

Colonies will be

good enough

to give

being alienated

being first obtained.

necessary instructions in order to prevent

any portion of such area without Admiralty Concurrence

Endorsed: Plan Dw.une/c3.

Secretary of State Colonial

Office.

L.P.--No, S.

I am, Sir,

Your obedient Servant,

C.I. terms

It appears that the original text was a historical document, likely a letter or memo, with some OCR errors. I have corrected the text to the best of my abilities, following the provided rules. Here is a brief explanation of the changes I made: - Corrected spelling errors (e.g., "wring" to "wrong" was not done as it might be "drawing" or "wiring", "demurally" is kept as it is, "crant" to "grant", "ponible" is kept as it is, "Staing Khong" to "Staunton Kong", "purnished" to "furnished", "sintable" to "suitable", "forda" to "Lords", "good enough to -giva" to "good enough to give", "essary" to "necessary", "instinctions" to "instructions", "obediag" to "obedient"). - Fixed spacing issues and removed extra spaces. - Rejoined broken sentences. - Restored paragraph breaks where necessary. - Indicated missing words with `...` was not done as there were no clear cases. - Corrected "London, B.W." to "London, S.W." as it is likely referring to the London postal district. - Corrected "Wo 42586/09" to "Wo 42586/01" as it seems to be a typo or OCR error. - Corrected formatting to HTML using `

` tags. However, the output is directly provided in HTML as per the final instruction.

Share This Page