426
Appendix F [referred to in Orrenfations on the Evide
Dupreme Court pp. 204] 267
9th October 1905
.
Si.
In reply to your queries I bez respectfully to state that when you have passed conditions of sale.
to
IKO,
it
LOOS
you had
after you
! yourselt personally.
leoked into thom, athing one to look into the,
"Japert
to-clock clates, names, and insonnets before returning- these to-Soliciters, you never asked me to settled them
nor have I ever done so
In
628
ofthe eviden
regard to questions 627, bes -takin Estore the Commission of euguing, I say that
You once sond
for
me
to ascertain the
of
copies of bilis allowed in Taxation because me Solicito had contoudect it was 2 another 3 while you also
Seich 3. and I confirmed what if
you
had stated. I
can the officer in charge of bills and there was
allowed I ann Dure of this.
nothing sail about a sum
of $6.2 or $3 bring
Fir that
nover at any
a quration of
I also boy to inform you
time have you
wer consuited me on a
practic or privedere - I am prepared to serve that
all Thave stated is the truth.
Norton Ky the Roy
Prages bar, upreme Court,
Your
Itan
or ocdient servant.