Ammoting withitistence, 382 209
five Soliciter. not want the withers or that thin core
hance of for the other side having hoken down,
S. Harston
フク
1.718.
judgment had been given without an
bean tabain. It is difficult
svidence having
remember the wrestanes of each.
and it is manifestly unfair
the them
a charge has been con up yash an
individual, that the latter she whe
a examining
precluded from cross-
accuser and fand quilty
Lang
C
experte
statement and without doen
evidence in support being
documenting
chleinste kein. The same applies wall
questions in reg and texpect widence. I have always allowed there where
proved my satisfaction
it wa
that the witmen
expert one.
elly
I deny An Statement of her. Hurston
Lito
The question of home Sharpe, lately
I
asting Attomey-feneral for 2
months young
hu. Hanston
you commider the Attorney-ferend is entitled ofeen", and
4