Unserations
questions
Yo,
Au Deport. 257 84
and amore
the summery
o, they would have fun!", folling to questions there, forourable answer but because they happen the mim favour they
Collusion!
do not take up there refenter, in their report, and in reference Thing sub-section 5, I refer in particularm to
clearly in my
944,945, which are
from:
I
and of course there are capply omitted from the report. If this day. wisher unfarmers I
I dont kunn
what can. by remarks in these amcisions are sufficient. I consider these answers in my favour having been mitted by the time
laft
in their Report is a fast in my fornrable time inasmuch to it
Shews in itself that they were out for
no other purpose than to give a one-sided report that wild entirely damn me if th Commisscalers can pouze toto. Isubmit the authorities that there emision, will shew the
animes and partiality prevalent throughout this most partial report.
accounts referred
6. That in matters
Then he makes no proper personal
of the accounts, and commst
examination
therepe deal with them in a
satisfactory
manner. ( fee Ausers to Questions 860-864,
899.900.)
860-804. no Evidence. Ex-parte
Statementy. Ilang weten ung sowingt ha
Some experience
The
why
the schicitors here, on
that he works hunsely that I am unacquainted with. I certainly might
to hand has allowed &
"Guastion him mi
be that he aware
"Collusion between solicitors, which he refers to. It may not and portably
that
of formething
be acquainted with for my future guidance
in dealing with these five Solicitors:
#
....