444
M: Cox
In the case
of a double track with centre-pole septem and a span of bft & inches between the = tracks
thu
all
Co not bound under the ordre to concreti que middle strip of 3ft Ons between the a tracks,
appears to be that this Co
But the D.P.Ws cax
voluntarily undertook to concrete this middle strip inconton for brings allowed to substituto double track centre fole systems for a double track Sidh tide say other which at only require 4/4
between the 2 tracks. And the D. P. W. pointi cross-section" (under sec 18 of the
to an
"approved"
ノ
as the result and the expression
of this arrency current
The Resident Eneyinces for the CO repudiates
thes "approved cross-section" in loto.
on such a matter there ought to be no drebb
chatever.
under sse 13 it was the duling of the C. at the trime
часть
when they gave ustia of intuition to luck up
cross-section before the D.Ph
the road to lacy
H. then
and I think we sh! invite the Company to state whether the cross-section forwarded by the Gore was laid by them before the
D.P.W. according to see 13 of the code, and,
other and if so what if not, & whether
ady
cross-section was laid by than before the D. P. Cs and approved by
kim.
answer & in the nce, ative and cannot show that
there is any other "approved cross-section" ui it's place
they will by in retter and
austinant position, carrying
nother can be stopped from carry my out further work until there is an "approved
curso.osition"
4
See BotT Sodig.
Ishr
но
Chavan
whey the Compancy sh? not be held mors than they
to their as preement to do something
wen legally bound to do under the order
if
L
afsporcars to be the fact, they voluntarily entered into that agreement in conson of being allowed
←
priviles which they wor not therwise have obtained us the substitution of centre. pole for
Side pole system.
[ Either Dickensa&Co have not been straight froward
in then concop, with
1
of there has ben
ad
Strinco
ssunderstanding, be houn them, their Residiing ances
in Hong Kong and the work
The only reframe I caus
found in Dickens, & Coś kethes
כי
to the alleged agreement is in their letter of 25 th Apit
in which they way their clients "i would accept” such an arrangement. According to the Goo? the Company did accept it by deposition. crom-section Giving affect to it, and the Coo! on their part accepted by approving the
ut to be cleared w/s, I think
M
Cross-section.
The matter
ong
Procedarpertised
]
J.J.R.
22/10
HBS atonces
22/10