alter
ou
للشتا
devrsim & say
the fees neat b-
B
and paid to
law
it neat.
claimed
the Treasury
of the
won't all m
this
br altred
en
the
of
of which
5.
shmed send
lines
mauritius offre 35 of 99
No. 418.
Hongkong.
Sir,
а
Add
Apy
$110
you Aff
bring mit vede and into
where is did wit
Say
than thin
practic
The Crown Colmin
fres ay
forwinly cont
Inenting
"that S B. M. has now
2
Uji
mc? them for
X
had 6 The rights
هما
topard wing mint mut
losure 1.
Mindated.)
that the comment Abrogare le excerpted from
the mud
fural
Japree. Off com
All 2/10
Ju79
atonce
9110
Gov
IREC
C. O.
36686
MFG 9 OCT 03
Goverment House,
Hongkong, 1st. September, 1903.
357
With reference to your Despatches No. 393
of the 20th. November, 1902, and No. 192 of the 22nd. May last,
I have the honour to forward a further minute from the Attorney-
General which he has requested may be submitted for your con-
sideration.
2.
Sir Henry Berkeley contends that when
Counsel's fees are awarded cgainst an opposite party and are
included in the Bill of Coste, such fees must be paid to the
Barrister representing the Crow. If not so paid then their
inclusion in the Bill of Costs is illegal and should be dis-
continued.
-do
He also requests that he may be allowed
to draw these fees because, in such cases, he appears, not
*virtute officii" as Attorney-General, but simply as a Barris-
ter on behalf of the Crown.
3.
I regret that in my Despatch No. 436 of
the 30th. September last you were, on the authority of a
minute by the Crown Solicitor, copy of which is enclosed,
misinformed as to the cases in which fees are charged when
nclosure 2.
29th August, 1902.
the Attorney-General appears as Counsel.
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
Lord
JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P.,
&C...
&C..
20. -
Page 360Page 361