Enclosure

31st July, 1903.

214

advice of the Executive Council, (at which Major-General

Gascoigne was, however, not present) I decided to introduce a Bill conferring upon the Government a retrospective power of

appeal to the Supreme Court upon good cause shown in cases

where a title had not yet been granted.

6.

The Bill met with some opposition in the

Legislative Council, as the accompanying report of the proceed-

ings in Committee on the Bill will show.

It is but right however to add, for your

information, that it is believed that Mr. Shewan is interested

as one of the Syndicate who has either purchased or contracted

to purchase Ho Lap Pun's claim. It is also to be noted that

Dr. Ho Kai was a witness in the same case for the claimant.

You will observe, however, that the prin-

ciple of the Bill was supported by 3 out of the 6 Un-official

Members of the Council though it found an opponent in Major-

General Gascoigne.

7.

It was not deemed desirable to confine the

scope of the Bill to the two cases in question for there may

be others (though it is not likely) in New Kowloon which

Government may wish to have reviewed.

As regards the rest of the New Territories,

where there are not many disputed claims, very few cases (and

those only of minor importance) have been heard there by the

Land Court, whose time has been principally devoted to the

hearing of claims in New Kowloon. It will therefore not be

necessary to institute any retrospective appeals outside of

New Kowloon as far as I am aware at present.

I

Share This Page