I character, and were intended
for the guidance of offices Hay Roy
of the
Service
the exercise who wore in
oftheir oftion between.
fa
dollar and starting terms. Now, have, as you desp. "under ack) informs my the time allowed option has elapsed, and the explanations supplied be muffled in to the notes
seem hardly required
* longer.
3. Several of the
any
notes morean, deal with pouits as to which General Orders have ben wuid. Lust fo austace Notes 2,3,
Deane
4,5 with relate to subjects included in
General
note
g
Order No. 60.
robrich is the
our subject at Geverst order
Ns. bl: A; note 10 on
the same
Lyeneral
fa
as 233
subject Order No. 47.
The same applies to to for note 11 (General
where
0 ider No.57), note 12
Orders Nos 61862),
(General
and note 14 (. General Ordes
No.57).
all these
A
ceses
think it would be better
J
to amend a sufflement
wersary, the General
in question,
Orders which
9943
authoritative rather than to nens notes which
are
merely explanatory.
Rekena
in
4.4
similar
course should be folland opinion, in regard The rule embodied
Profesed
anote,
to
in the new n
No.16.
I do not altogether
appriciate how the
new rule would work, and Ishould begled of a concrete uistance. seems to me,