his Cox.
I have examined this order and it appear to be
draflid so ao
system.
begally to
cancy
int the propoact
I do not think the fewers of the Registrar under sec
122-12/ shifr objected to. They
ou the same a
#rose
confered on the band count by the 10 d. ander 18 of 1900 and offices to be aequally needful to the Registras
in administering this orde
There is a slight defect of from, fancy;
find any
as I cannot reference in the body of the order to from A *C, in the schurch, but this need hardly to noticed as under sec 21 (a) rify the Sort in Cormeil can make Rubes no
1
to theme Forums
? Proced
Comment an
proposed
2.J.R. 16/2
5
it
And add, with ref. to par that it is presumed that is not intended that Garden should I land for 75 yes, but
Lot
Act him Wheth he intouds
75 that 25
only for the state firends referred you shal
toon f. XXVI of the Land Commision Refort, 1886-87.
Arfuc
GWJ 20/2
(AF)
be the ter for Gander d if so hip reason for it. &
So purenet Sanction
proved
17BC
23/2
Grat
25 Felt
atone
Thu form
''
The new
Tarrilônico Titles ordinancer cą oż is rather mussal for
the full title of an Ordinance.
I suppose there is no
objection & it!
Mus Collsus
25/2.
Doverlooked this. If shite noticed & I
have added a par. to the draff
accordingly
JJR.25/2