eservation of
a portion
of the
Kowloon reserve,
these D.
4. May Gen Gascoigne
appears to have been mis
taken; in
stating, in part. 5
of his li. of 1st Rep. 1900,
that exchange
no. 3 had
been arranged in principale
from
since it is clear that
the Yor's deap of 28 Aug. 00
the which refd solely to exchanges n5772, vencloved only the tracings relating to those exchanges, that : when Sir Hy Blake, in
that desh, stated that he approved the recommen-
dations of the encl, report, his approval, so fares
exchange
no
3 was concerned.
fordr
DRAFT.
ང་
only extended to the
613
mendation, that
surveys of the lands
in questn she be prepared.
order
to facilitate the
further consideration of
the project,
which
was in fact, all that the confere
rence recommended
on the point.
5. Mr. b. does
not entirely
concur
with the views expressed
by the Gor
~20
in his desks
489 of 28 Nov. beams &
no 525 of 31 st Decs last,
since he is of pinion
that if the Kowlson Mily
Reserves
OL ve
released
from the reservation, that the bolony
-magh family