In the Trails & IMS, and no doubt in other colonies also a laboures can lears a tyrannical manates without notice
on paying him an amount aqual to a months wages from the date
of
his determrning his contract.
I think see 5 of this order should be amended in
this seass.
Sic 8 the words "five" & "there" bene, folaced in brackets and
the wars in the marginal note to sta
24
indicat
carelerowers in revision of proofs, but I do not
know who is responsible for 'this
? Sanction, subject to amendment
15965
2/8.5/2
When Straits Ordce. 21 of '89, which extended to domestic servants the provisions
of Ordce 1 of 1882,
be seen
of 1882, was received, fr the minutes.
it
will
1237 that the
89.90
Ordce wyas apt cored with much hesi
tation, working after.
vas
Such report
Y
Ave
asked for
a
report on its
a
year.
8709
?
we have heard
weed in
nothing
on the subject since; but it by follows that the orace has
no meano
worked satisfactorily since 1891 & I do not at all like its promsions being extended.
to Hongkong [ece spects. 12 of this Ordiffut.
Reply on pertines of dooky to
of 1237
ofdding cofto
Straits of
of
0
5
89.90
aufto amokat./
lafo
above minute & at the same
time finform for. Straits that
Hongkong based afmended
has been hapsed on Stqaits / Ordce (of 82
}
aLa
B&L (x)—50634-3000-12-01
51040-3000-3-02
Isee that the objectionable prooms of 5.12 has long been inforce as regards domestic servants in they under £ yor. 1471845
M.
£363)
?Proceed as proposed gu).6/2
Mucas
501
So fromed back for report the working of the ordre at the end ga je
да
on
gear 17 Be
CpY
at and