no reason to Hemsider Lord
& ask for an
Knutsford's ruling
explanation of
thu
for ignoring that decision.
М. Сок
RY
6/0
Tentirely agree.
rus
17/"
Sir Mommanney Jafree.
Sin I Anduson tree
ABE
7/1
appears bene that the reasons for not
arbiy
lu
Lord Kutiful's direction are
given in tritt Mukeley's second www- and that there is much force in them. Tohould be inclined to say that dritt toesteley's request
Whe allained b`receive these fees Counch be so bechained but that as regards the practice of claiming there fees wi the band want inch the broturgy that
Tatuap Sit Wakeley has thevergoods for adhering lit but practice and that In Charibu lain has decided wch & disturb it, the Laned
B&I: (x)--50654-3000-12-01
Canti", in which thee for an
510
uncleedury
being as there ha fore, puid into the Treasury,
deser
€
be connect, I think, alcapthepans
He delibuat.
iquaring of ther
mitention of the Secretary of State Ever sincer 18790 although it many wish now
be thought
uccessary
6
04.
requière compliance with it.
Into
8711
Will not this create a divergence
of practice in Various Colomis Is there
any
reason for suck
dinspace? If not would not he well & instinct other
Colonies 2.5. W. Judies & edit
The Janse Tule
Loud Onslow
I am unable
to day
078/11
what the practice
is throughout the Colonies in this matter. . To defartinto for
which infond
tion we possen.
WORL
15711