this opportunity of forwarding As your information acots of desf which elle has addressed to the
on
the suljict of these proposals
Jam
OrLi
HONC DESPATCH.
or No. 3178
902 May
previous Paper. 23V You 3000
sequent Paper. 100 Berb N2 30/3
(Subject.) Education C.0. 23013 62 RECO Red 9 JUN 021
Leards letters from oto Wright going his crews on the Committee's report • far as it applies to the duen Colleg
M. Tricas (Minutes.)
Dr. Wright's affrotation of the Chunin bay and the system under Chinese which he is educated at Queen's College is astounding, in view of the resort in 29159/01 and the results of the regstum
is Mh. im Them's munite, to the admission on More Lover system. fouits
Dr. Wright's fast any headmaster be of radical faults in that system. But I don't suffuse of over twenty pfected to Kaupm facture.
dan stauchong Partial even I do not think we need settle the question of the interne organization of Quen's College offhoug
However, to follow the instructions more closely and improve the text: ## Step 1: Re-examine the text for OCR errors and correct spelling mistakes. The given text contains numerous OCR errors and spelling mistakes. Let's start by correcting them: - "acots" could be "copy" or another word depending on context. - "desf" is likely "despatch" or another related word. - "elle" might be "elle" is not clear, possibly "he" or another pronoun. - "suljict" is "subject". - "Jam OrLi" is unclear, possibly a name or initials. - "HONC DESPATCH" seems to be a header or title. - "sequent Paper" could be "subsequent Paper". - "Berb N2 30/3" is likely a file reference. - "C.0." might be "C.O." or an abbreviation for a department. - "RECO" could be "Received" or another related term. - "Leards" is likely "Refers" or "Reads". - "oto" is "to". - "duen Colleg" is "Queen's College". - "M. Tricas" is likely a person's name, possibly "Mr. Triccas" or another similar name. - "affrotation" is not clear; possibly "approval" or "appreciation". - "Chunin bay" is unclear; context is needed. - "regstum" could be "regard" or another related word. - "Mh. im Them's" is likely "Mr. [Name]'s", possibly "Mr. Im Thurn's". - "fouits" is not clear. - "suffuse" is used but the context is unclear; it might be a correct usage or an OCR error. - "Kaupm facture" is not clear; possibly " Kaufman" or another name related to "facture" or "factor". - "stauchong" is not clear. - "Quen's College" is "Queen's College". - "offhoug" is likely "although". ## Step 2: Apply the corrections and reformat the text according to the given rules. Let's correct and reformat the text with the above observations in mind.this opportunity of forwarding As your information copy of despatch which he has addressed to the
on
the subject of these proposals
[Name/Initials]
HONC DESPATCH.
or No. 3178
902 May
previous Paper. 23V You 3000
subsequent Paper. 100 Berb N2 30/3
(Subject.) Education C.O. 23013 62 Received Red 9 JUN 021
Refers to letters from Dr. Wright going into his views on the Committee's report as far as it applies to Queen's College
M. Tricas (Minutes.)
Dr. Wright's approval of the Chinese system under which he is educated at Queen's College is astounding, in view of the report in 29159/01 and the results of the regard
is Mr. Im Thurn's minute, regarding the admission to the Lower system.
Dr. Wright's statement that any headmaster be of radical faults in that system. But I don't see more than twenty affected to Kaufman factor.
Partial even I do not think we need settle the question of the internal organization of Queen's College although
The final answer is:this opportunity of forwarding As your information copy of despatch which he has addressed to the
on
the subject of these proposals
[Name/Initials]
HONC DESPATCH.
or No.3178
902 May
previous Paper.23V You 3000
subsequent Paper.100 BerbN2 30/3
(Subject.) Education C.O.23013 62 Received Red 9 JUN 021
Refers to letters from Dr. Wright going into his views on the Committee's report as far as it applies to Queen's College
M. Tricas (Minutes.)
Dr. Wright's approval of the Chinese system under which he is educated at Queen's College is astounding, in view of the report in 29159/01 and the results of the regard
is Mr. Im Thurn's minute, regarding the admission to the Lower system.
Dr. Wright's statement that any headmaster be of radical faults in that system. But I don't see more than twenty affected to Kaufman factor.
Partial even I do not think we need settle the question of the internal organization of Queen's College although