that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be
at least
Stake
reduced by $200,000. Some offertents of that I had
saging
The necessit for
bar reduct
intended to embestyrefly in a desfalch einefly Gy desk.
to your confidentit desfatch of 17 Janney (which need no
be regarded as
layer
confidential.)
but that the matter
wan
accidentall aulicked. If I take this offortunity of
saying
that I am by
satisfied
tw me any
with the
action taken
ad the wrift of
telegram of the 12th
Cherefore
do regard
December, by
the
474
So officers
are
who
members of the Public Works Committee
nal of Hytters
niche de
the list
of my Public Works Each a ordinary
et
bodily be reported, or the Committer argued to of
regarded
an works
fuming merity
In my opinion the resolution adoptic
cercumstances bhare
received a support
from
by
the Committee
should not have been ought
get not, und fe
they official ut officers
for Your
a
Why Committee A
to six
the Chamian ought
When und to
Sin
any way.
I have
8. The asked the C.A. fu the Colomes totake
stity for the relation
Overson for
an
After re-examining the text and following the instructions:I am to inform you that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be at least reduced by $200,000. Some observations of that I had suggesting the necessity for such reduction were intended to be embodied briefly in a despatch lying on my desk.
Referring to your confidential despatch of 17 January (which need not be regarded as confidential any longer) I may say that the matter was accidentally overlooked. If I take this opportunity of saying that I am satisfied with the action taken and the wording of the telegram of the 12th December, by the Governor, I do so because 474 officers are members of the Public Works Committee.
As for the list of my Public Works, each ordinary item bodily be reported, or the Committee argued to be regarded as works furnishing merit.
In my opinion, the resolution adopted under the circumstances there received a support from the Committee, and should not have been brought forward by official members of the Committee in any way.
I have asked the Colonial Accountant for the Colonies to take steps for the revision of Overson for an...
Here is the corrected version in HTML format:I am to inform you that I could not reconsider the decision that the proposed expenditure on public works must be at least reduced by $200,000. Some observations of that I had suggesting the necessity for such reduction were intended to be embodied briefly in a despatch lying on my desk.
Referring to your confidential despatch of 17 January (which need not be regarded as confidential any longer) I may say that the matter was accidentally overlooked. If I take this opportunity of saying that I am satisfied with the action taken and the wording of the telegram of the 12th December, by the Governor, I do so because some officers are members of the Public Works Committee.
As for the list of my Public Works, each ordinary item should be reported, or the Committee argued that it should be regarded as works of merit.
In my opinion, the resolution adopted under the circumstances should not have been brought forward by official members of the Committee in any way.
I have asked the Colonial Accountant for the Colonies to take steps for the revision of Overson for an...