Page 80

(see page

but hold appts, as Demarcation officers in the Land Court (2 turned down in end in 41680/01

I approve observing that the

14027/00 involved

me

scheme approved on 1402 included a proposal that Europeans should not in future be apptd to these Junior Interpreterships, & ask if are correct in understanding." Mr. Nolan is the only European interpreter left in the service, beside Mr. Ball

now

C.Pd. I may

at once.

that

No. 4

You

vabıb

01

Sir,

C. O. 10017

Government House,

Hongkong, 4th February, 1902.

191

I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of your Despatch No. 425 of the 19th December last, relative to the position of Mr. Nolan in respect of the new Interpretation Scheme,

2.

In reply, I have to inform you that it was not contemplated that European Interpreters should come under the Interpretation Scheme, and the scale of salaries was framed for Chinese. The Interpretation Committee recommended the engagement of a good European Interpreter for the Magistracy, and it was decided that the Chief Interpreter at the Supreme Court should also be a European, but as it is very improbable that Europeans of good social position and having the necessary qualifications will be found in the future to fill those posts, no recommendation was made.

3.

You

Mr. Nolan, who is a European, entered the Service under a different scheme than that which has been recently framed for Interpreters of Chinese nationality, and the remarks contained in Sir Henry Blake's Despatch No. 141 of the 3rd April, 1900, regarding the difficulties of obtaining competent European Interpreters are applicable to the case of Mr. Nolan, who, being a competent European Interpreter

THE RIGHT HONOURABLE

JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P.,

&c.

&c.

Page 191

(end of page signal detected, kept as is)

(no further text to process)

Share This Page