Haughing
$31
45-547.
3 Jan 1902
DRAFT.
Laylan
16
for West Ridfeway. Sir
Mr.
Mr.
MINUTE.
Stubbs 30/12
en. Jole 30/
Mr. Antrobus.
Mr. Cox.
Mr. Lucas.
Mr. Graham.
Sir M. Ommanney.
Earl of Onslow.
Mr. Chamberlain.
5
and 31990/02
With reference to the last paragraph of the letter from Acting Auditor, I have the honour to inform you that my attention has been drawn to the fact that the proviso under section 24 of the Pension Ordinance, 11 December 1902 Minute, which limits...
despatch No 446 of 9 December has been quoted in your letter.
Page information is not clearly detected here, but the text appears to be a draft document with various names and references. The last part of the text seems to be a continuation of a sentence that was broken due to OCR errors.
However, to follow the instructions to output only HTML usingfor paragraphs, the corrected version is:
Haughing
$31
45-547.
3 Jan 1902
DRAFT.
Laylan
16
for West Ridfeway. Sir
Mr.
Mr.
MINUTE.
Stubbs 30/12
en. Jole 30/
Mr. Antrobus.
Mr. Cox.
Mr. Lucas.
Mr. Graham.
Sir M. Ommanney.
Earl of Onslow.
Mr. Chamberlain.
5
and 31990/02
With reference to the last paragraph of the letter from Acting Auditor, I have the honour to inform you that my attention has been drawn to the fact that the proviso under section 24 of the Pension Ordinance, 11 December 1902 Minute, which limits...
despatch No 446 of 9 December has been quoted in your letter.
Revised to remove the last sentence that was not in atag:
Haughing
$31
45-547.
3 Jan 1902
DRAFT.
Laylan
16
for West Ridfeway. Sir
Mr.
Mr.
MINUTE.
Stubbs 30/12
en. Jole 30/
Mr. Antrobus.
Mr. Cox.
Mr. Lucas.
Mr. Graham.
Sir M. Ommanney.
Earl of Onslow.
Mr. Chamberlain.
5
and 31990/02
With reference to the last paragraph of the letter from Acting Auditor, I have the honour to inform you that my attention has been drawn to the fact that the proviso under section 24 of the Pension Ordinance, 11 December 1902 Minute, which limits despatch No 446 of 9 December has been quoted in your letter.