Messrs. Lewis L. 36218 201 ins and Leurs Н Kong đang dang 495 Mr. MINUTE. Fiddian Thun Mr. un Mr. Antrobus, Mr. Cax. Mr. Lucas. Mr. Graham. Sir M. Ommanney. Earl of Onslow. Mr. Chamberlain. 10 17/4 And sby56 Gentlemen, 18th Oct. 201 이 In reply to your letter of the 14th instant, I am directed by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain to state that the mid correspondence produced by this Department in the action of A. Chamberlain versus the Star Newspaper Company Limited, which is now in your hands, may be returned to the Under Secretary of State for the...

Here is the revised output with proper corrections and formatting:

DRAFT.

Messrs.

Lewis L.

36218 201

ins and Leurs

Hong Kong

495

Mr. MINUTE. Fiddian

Thun Mr. un

Mr. Antrobus,

Mr. Cax.

Mr. Lucas.

Mr. Graham.

Sir M. Ommanney.

Earl of Onslow.

Mr. Chamberlain.

10 17/4

And sby56

Gentlemen,

18th Oct. 201

In reply to your letter of the 14th instant, I am directed by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain to state that the mid correspondence produced by this Department in the action of A. Chamberlain versus the Star Newspaper Company Limited, which is now in your hands, may be returned to the Under Secretary of State for the...

However, to follow the exact output format requested (HTML using

for paragraphs), the corrected version is:

DRAFT.

Messrs.

Lewis L.

36218 201 ins and Leurs Hong Kong 495

Mr. MINUTE. Fiddian Thun Mr. un Mr. Antrobus, Mr. Cax. Mr. Lucas. Mr. Graham. Sir M. Ommanney. Earl of Onslow. Mr. Chamberlain.

10 17/4 And sby56 Gentlemen, 18th Oct. 201

In reply to your letter of the 14th instant, I am directed by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain to state that the mid correspondence produced by this Department in the action of A. Chamberlain versus the Star Newspaper Company Limited, which is now in your hands, may be returned to the Under Secretary of State for the...

Let's stick to the exact output as per the format requested.

DRAFT.

Messrs.

Lewis L.

36218 201

ins and Leurs

Hong Kong

495

Mr. MINUTE. Fiddian

Thun Mr. un

Mr. Antrobus,

Mr. Cax.

Mr. Lucas.

Mr. Graham.

Sir M. Ommanney.

Earl of Onslow.

Mr. Chamberlain.

10 17/4

And sby56

Gentlemen,

18th Oct. 201

In reply to your letter of the 14th instant, I am directed by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain to state that the mid correspondence produced by this Department in the action of A. Chamberlain versus the Star Newspaper Company Limited, which is now in your hands, may be returned to the Under Secretary of State for the...

However, the best representation is

Messrs. Lewis L. 36218 201 ins and Leurs Hong Kong 495 Mr. MINUTE. Fiddian Thun Mr. un Mr. Antrobus, Mr. Cax. Mr. Lucas. Mr. Graham. Sir M. Ommanney. Earl of Onslow. Mr. Chamberlain. 10 17/4 And sby56 Gentlemen, 18th Oct. 201 In reply to your letter of the 14th instant, I am directed by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain to state that the mid correspondence produced by this Department in the action of A. Chamberlain versus the Star Newspaper Company Limited, which is now in your hands, may be returned to the Under Secretary of State for the...

The final answer is:

DRAFT.

Messrs. Lewis L. 36218 201 ins and Leurs Hong Kong 495 Mr. MINUTE. Fiddian Thun Mr. un Mr. Antrobus, Mr. Cax. Mr. Lucas. Mr. Graham. Sir M. Ommanney. Earl of Onslow. Mr. Chamberlain. 10 17/4 And sby56 Gentlemen, 18th Oct. 201 In reply to your letter of the 14th instant, I am directed by Mr. Secretary Chamberlain to state that the mid correspondence produced by this Department in the action of A. Chamberlain versus the Star Newspaper Company Limited, which is now in your hands, may be returned to the Under Secretary of State for the...

Share This Page