the content in of the Colonial Govt.,
that W.O. should pay the value & the capitalized Crown rent, would
seem to be justified.
(The W.O. are other S.O.C.'s to the value of the land will have to be met ultimately, if it is pressed, I an independent valuation
must first arrange Rabici's fee, to avoid the dispute that occurred in
but was provisionally transferred to the W.O.
516 the W.O. would still
before that date
actually
be bound to pay for the land and not
merely to credit the
amount
to the Colony
in the Mil: Lands Account as
pointed out in para 3 of letter on 31905
there
to the
an
in Caplen)
A.R.14/5
Draft for Carson pointing out that
the letter of 1897 referred to only related to the provision of sites for particular works
that as general
stated in our letter in 20764/00 the liability of the Colony to give land, free of cost, has never been admitted
and
that under the
the
par.99
case of Hong Kong
Zwh. quotes
dear to the too concurred in in their letter
the War Dept.
Now
that the Mil:
32932/00 Contribution has been fixed at 20%, is to pay for all land required for military purposes even if it be contended that
Letter
an 14289
98.
whereas Chidiya
new work
this new-arrangement only came into operation on the 1st Jan last & that this land
(x)-81215-4000-6-1900
36518-3000-11-1900
as obligation
the Colony to
hand over land to the War Dept in
anticipation of any Mil Land being surrendered to the Colony,
How
fact the practically
not
Mil: Lands Account has with the
come into existence in since the
value of the Lands hitherto surrendered to
the Colony only amounts to $42,
Saft
20
& take opportunity of again asking W.O. to pay to H. Kong $10,465.04 referred to
in letter
Ow
31905