(xiii) Repeal of Ordinance 5 of 1880.
The enactment in question was simply an Ordinance to amend section 8 of Ordinance 9 of 1857, part of which section is still in force.
It would seem, however, that the enactment in question may safely be repealed (see section 10 of Ordinance 24 of 1897).
(xiv) Repeal of Ordinance 9 of 1882.
The Ordinance in question was passed to remove certain doubts as to the powers of the Official Assignee in Bankruptcy under Ordinances 5 of 1864 and 15 of 1867.
These two latter Ordinances were repealed by section 2 of Ordinance 20 of 1891.
Page 512
DESPATCH
43240
No.
432440
Received 9 DEC 01
(Subject:)
(xv) Repeal of Ordinance 6 of 1885.
This Ordinance amends section 27 of Ordinance 14 of 1870, which latter Ordinance was repealed by Ordinance 13 of 1883.
(xvi) Repeal of Ordinance 4 of 1887.
This is simply a Statute Law Revision Ordinance, which repealed several obsolete enactments.
(xvii) Repeal of Ordinance 23 of 1887.
This Ordinance effected a small repeal in Ordinance 16 of 1887, which was in its turn repealed by Ordinance 10 of 1901.
(xviii) Repeal of Ordinance 11 of 1888.
This Ordinance dealt with a number of small unclaimed balances lying in the Supreme Court. It has had its effect. Section 5 is not reported because it is of general application.
(xix) Repeal of Ordinance 17 of 1889.
This is simply a repealing and amending Ordinance, and it would appear that it may safely be repealed. (See section 10 of Ordinance 24 of 1897).
(xx) Repeal of Ordinance 29 of 1890.
This Ordinance simply repealed Ordinance 13 of 1860, which related to the Civil List.
(xxi) Repeal of Ordinance 9 of 1891.
This Ordinance was simply passed with a view to remove doubts as to the validity of Ordinances 18 and 19 of 1884, in consequence of their not having been properly proclaimed. It has had its effect.
(xxii) Repeal of Ordinance 7 of 1893.
This Ordinance was passed to provide for the assessment of the amounts to be paid by way of compensation in respect of the Wharves and Piers along the line of that Praya Reclamation which was carried out under the provisions of Ordinance 16 of 1889. The assessment has long since been made.
(xxiii) Repeal of Ordinance 1 of 1896.
This Ordinance was simply passed to prevent doubts as to the validity of documents which had been theretofore sealed with the Seal of the Colonial Court of Admiralty in Hongkong. It has had its effect.
(xxiv) Repeal of Ordinance 10 of 1900.
The object of this Ordinance was to legalize all proceedings of the Legislative Council during the invalid appointment of Mr. A. W. BREWIN. It has had its effect.
Page 466
01
ous Paper.
quent Paper.
brace 30/01:- Building Amend
Submits
Whirley
Mr Johnn
Share copies to library Noted
Some brine
DJ.M.
7/1
Sir A Blaker sound in private letter that the then high buildings supprun Ba
This role is the Camm
of plague.
consequence.
I need not add anything
to the Acting Attorney General's report to the first four 549 bye-Laws in
To restrictions imposed by
similar to restrictions
As laws in this country.
CP.d.2 Ateca J.SR.2/1/02
atma
12