3 of 1900. 1899 fare in 5324/00/ which clause was to be abandoned by yard it's original two clauses with the previous sanction of the Secretary of State. In the present case will cease to be operative when the Land Court have done its work,
I do not see that we need object to the provision in
sect 2.
Land
Ought not sect 4 to be amended so as to bring the last four lines of total clause into agreement with the phraseology of the first two lines of sect 3(1) of Ord 32 of 1900 (in 1914/57). The words "required in the public interests" are to change. Should not the clause also contain some definite reference to Ord 32 of 1900?
hur Cox
Muh huces
8.5.). 12/12
I think the best way of carrying out we Johnson's suggestion
in line 2 of sect.4 [ISA] omit "the acquisition of", and
in line 4 of the same
for "is required in the public interests"
substitute "ought to be resumed for a public purpose within the meaning of section 2 of the Crown Lands Resumption Ordinance 1900
han
+
Agree Draft. At once
Page 449.
Enclosure
Sir,
RE: C.0
459
42619
&
REG? 4. DEC 01 Severawat Al 10807
Hongkong, 29th October, 1901.
I have the honour to transmit for the signification of His Majesty's pleasure the following Ordinance entitled
"An Ordinance to amend The New Territories Land Court Ordinance, 1900. (No.18 of 1900)."
No.27 of 1901.
2. The usual Report by the Attorney General is annexed.
I have the honour to be,
Sir,
Your most obedient
Humble Servant,
2.S.R. 13/12
Right Honourable
Joseph Chamberlain, M.P.
GOVERNOR, &c.