kept confidential (en 571/60).
7
Oce
fer whether they still object to this Memo being published, pointing out that Mr. Ch does not see that any objection could now exist, since the rectification of boundary referred to is trifling. I am to answer
and to the water around the Rebe Para. I is quite correct. traints. applies chiefly to the Western shore of the law of Lan-ta, ni all other territorial waters are clearly within the boundary, and if, and imagine we own the territorial right wer the usual three mile limits, the small Sland referred to Peninsula of kaked Hill, to in Pare. He is hart of Lan-tes.
is in any case But the Treaty in C.- 908 is not clear as to including the whole of the tão Tell 9.0 that we pay to answe Hace affit There is a mas car in pome in settle 4.132 East". we Sar
# astuse Dand offer two stovitorial waters. ? quen on this point, oberving that great isa no 721 inconvenience would arise if we had righ to over the waters on the Westion shore of han-tas, since it wt be impossible to police those waters Roas to prevent piracy. [ It will probably be necessary to refer to go to to Law Officers ]
Moha ? So proued. It is 22/12 a rey difficult question - whit the lease gives socalled evitonal waters", sights over "tent outside the boundanes V leased waters. 20 will us beconsulted but FO this doubt
ABL the will j& L (x)~46560—3000-S-01 24 Dec Remind 2.0. that the Law officer have advised us that the base confers Sovereignty, and therefore it follows that We have the 3 mile territorial right- Tell SMI as to the Peaked Hill mishlo, when we hear from 20, L as to the 3 mile kimit
See note from CPL 28 at once 2.D. annexed, and