gamist a Chinesi
fisherman for trespas
and conversion connection wit
2. The funiciple
in this case is of
mvolved in
infortance; and an
on
The occurr Another similar
obfurtunity should be sought mulher case,
menon to bring
before the
the question
best Court of Affel.
highest
I handh
14
mor.
No.
193
1901
May
previous Paper.
4893
Cons
0.0
DESPATVis
21763
139
34 UN OF
No. 21463
Leases of Foreshore Seabed
(Subject.)
daft orace will be introduced but for reasons stated objec to bsome of the modifications.
uent Paper
Mr. Risley Mr. in Thum
(Minutes.)
See also 21762
The question referred to
in far. 4 of this desp. is under Admiralty
I do not think the
vain
Ord / need wait until it is decided.
his
fusceeding proposed.
hur Cox
Ach, and affore with the aft ideas
A.F. 26/6
I do not understand par 3 of the desp. It seems to me
that, if the proviso to sItc 2
of the Draft ord (325 40242/00) wers cut out, the Crown lease which has been called in
might
question, the chairf Justice (21762) would not be confirmed be order and the matter no longer bring sub judice
曹
the effects of his guide went may propork, or remedied