was enrender mider to Polics Regulations but to proper to retain it wider the amending Adriance referred to buy Stubbs. here it red for Macis I kind
are
te vedal shout the returnat, as the thies
has us bendiouriosed"._" for dod
مسية
}
640
tur cox
tur wḍal's minste takes a savewhat different lens from
minute in 14983.,
But he
Soult was retine on reduc
ttu. previous
to which I understood
Pow
it-
peuse
ut Kick Hat the fact & replet wired becoming
aware of the cinstenin de garthing house would be suffi went "misconduct to justify the forens no with wing tho vedal presonnaly gwen-(that is non-persaver not amid- feasaro-) manenperably the further charges of having accrple brites as discloses no Repressions papers, which appear to have heen crease and thaugh More
satan as
Las Lee no.
• po the Enquire.
strial.
Munder the circumstances, for
? Bored shop, but
the their coronas
न
Lost authent Probably be th pouchat
posterrate in not having there further
her
mixtters enquial aito and
Sous le cartent &let well
Quing alone.
Berefore,
under the circumwaves
Lindoning
P&L (z)—12436--2000-1-99
? Roccer as proposed,
anfor Quinney near that authority the medal has no rechines.
22317--3000-10-99
any case
undesirable to
any
Vasmo,
t
give
? Reply
by hit Stubbs.
Now Lelbome
i
бо
refly.
Day
كا
سلام
afree.
it
maw
рабренед
g.W. J. 2/11
He was
dismissed
& consequently under the Police Regulations his medal was retumes (67) Reg 8)
When his dismissal was converted into setirement, inasmuch
me
quilt grisconduct, under $25 gordie 4007 as amended by nore 22995
his medal (which
The never got back) is liable to be """withdrawn":" It had already
been withdrawn de facto runder the odies is also withdrawn" dejure.
S 6/11
HBC
atercel
24
d