3
T
vessels using the same,
of the Harbour Master.
3
66
which deals also with the duty
Similar subject matter had been dealt with
in the Ordinance of 1891, Paragraph 2, which the present
Ordinance consolidates and amends, and the title of both
Ordinances is, as regards subject matter, the same.
Accordingly, I see no objection in principle
to this Section, as it forms part of the Code regulating
the duties of the Harbour Master.
sections:
For convenience I may add the corresponding
Section 26 of the present Ordinance corresponds
generally to Section 28 of the 1891 Ordinance.
Section 27 of the present Ordinance corresponds
to Section 29 of 1891 Ordinance.
Section 28 of the present Ordinance corresponds
to Section 30 of 1891 Ordinance.
Section 29 is new.
Section 30 corresponds to Section 31, except
Sub-section 3, which is new.
Paragraph 6. I certainly think that this
suggestion might well be given effect to.
Paragraph 7. As regards Table "J", there is
no necessity to retain it, because Section 5, sub-section
5. enables the Governor from time to time to fix them
7
within the limits prescribed by Table "I".
Its retention or otherwise is really a matter
of no great importance, but I should have thought it more
convenient to retain it.
I see no objection to the concluding suggestion
of this paragraph.
Paragraph
4