out that Sir Hary Blake appears to have matosoked 2 The war din of the footnote to
Colonial Regulation 66. you will obseve is to the
That a pestion distinctly
states, that the limits
Λ
an not
£100 £200
or their equivalents, but
$100
600 and
$1200. This
imptiel afform to pt that
the dollar limits
need not
necessarily respond
ot intended to
exactly to the starting
lists.
3.
Laven of opinion,
Amore, that the
havever
wide dirigence beliveen
the sterling and the
No date
dollar limits is anomalous
and that the tallar limits
quen
لمو
with advantage be raised. Whatting for #istatte is night in I shall be glad
Whether you
ha Kama
consider that,
as Six H Blake Suggests
in the case
of thy 33
Straits Settlements and
Hong Kong might pok be fixed at $1,000 and $2
This
2000
respectively.
attuation would, of cause'
#1000 should be taken to also abb to the
Comerford to ₤100
In cases
to
footnote to Colonial
which compensation Regulation No. 153;
allowance is attached #1000 is no doubt worth considerally
more than £100, and this consideration would
apper
the limit of $3,000
per
annu
for aft
Hts,
the offices selected
to the passage uygulation for which have thes
No 153. On the other
hande for the purpose of Regulations No. 66 and 76`d. there would be no great divergence between the two sums, in spite
the recent upward tending the exchange tralue of
2
The dollar
basszes faid, being
raised to $5,000 fu
4. Iwould not
bene cessay
I think, to make
change in
any Colonial Regulation
No. 99, since the