mue safequads which they are prepared tautuit&, and shoegly urge that in these provisions this Adrianco districtia Proud Lewende Letween the
J
tholesale & retail trades, and concur in to recommendation neato
My Macuapten on this pants referred &nchis mimte. Dict I have worked "D"
by
Mr. Cix.
I also coven with bein in his remart
noted as
as to the mad coahlif conferring the stringent powers
havnsk / arrest
fered trees: 20226 on
wring I. members of the Police force, and I hint further that the magistrate Stowed act upon the oath fany
as in Recs: 16 & 2nd lect
K
person That it should be on the oath of some officer of the Police Mines.
I coueur generally, to in by The haghtens oupprotions at
L "?"
Strick el: 22 mighty
"I
also
Le modifiis.
zeno: lace parabut one) - but inseunuch is it represents reo: 18 of 90.8 4.95 I presumes it
as not worker. Endly.
as derived in the
A
S.S.M.
I imagine that Section 9 is intended to make
all the members of
Pirate (rew liable to
punishment even though they are not carrying arms, but it seems open to the objection pointed out alove.
? Ash as to it.
467
I do not
that there is
agree
aly
need to awe of
Sections 16, 2021 because the Captain Supt
of Police & the Magistinte respectively be trusted to give
the
Hm
time carLA
necessary authority to suitable Police Officers & it may
be i that a Constable is thoroughly
hist worthy -
I
716
3&1 (x)--12435-2000-1-99
22317--8000-10-99
Otherwise I agree in the above minutes.
G.w.J. 8/6
choLucas
Please see machinal minutes with the present Chinese crisis upon, + the prospect of stallion on outraps on foreigners in the Chinese teritones near Hong Kong I do not think that it wibe to overrule the Hong Kong legislature
easy.
Chu
matter of chilliginee
thing kind.
I think that
with regard to China a season may
exest
Erfaring laws to petect foreign counties
If the heavy licence fee is intended likel to prevent smagftig gern
I think it
sha beathered to but Iwould ark
the fort whether they consider this purvision's Jumpose & suffert. essential for that
the licence
that if it is not the amount oft
fee she be
reduced.
I think clause 5. wants modification. D doubt whether the first proviso = 88 meet the difficulty pointer out.
The objections to 867
are not Ithink serious. The difficulties gexpating armo
she be made substantial & Ido mother how the provisions of this seen to be modified to