that I follow tIshnson's argument esto
the amend of §20. If
made any age.
no amcast is
asto sent payable in
produce since the order came into force will be rid. If
we alter that as chestham
peof such diverted the interval between реброто
^
the coming into operation of the orie- the forks proclamation will presumably be
o thee no revenit forthing
valind
གས།
to the
difficult questions might einse validity of such apsee t. Twe prefer mat present advised to leave this clausealanes
:Subject to above a
proccdes pertred.
May 17
risk
There is a certain amount of
In a law
this Kind but there is
more risk of evil from delay Telegraphe as proposed-
din a
despatche
J
agree
CRI
Sanction but direct amendmente as also & Suggest that to meet Mr. Whitehead's Fedinical objections - the whole laus with the amendments should be reintroduced
Add words emphasising the necessity of
giving fall notice and ample explanation to the villagers
CPD Jaan 18 May
alacie
Mus
Mi Cox to th
May 19
4 Reansbrick Strid
Southport 139 Lameshin.
15 May
bras her Fiddian.
74900.
1200
Have read hele f
It seems to me
will calculated to facilitati
a settlement of
Eucation in the waw
tutors. Es regands
9 Чисти
nction 20.
doubt landholders Zest