ground. I have penalised an it. I will for points. defined Ittav ane hos regulations only supplement it in Section 2 "Harben Limited.
A are insufficiently to define the context be drawn definit point therein by Kombom isly unless given. The depiction though not accurate, ? suggest Section 3.552(b). very I in broke 26'91 would be dear at first sight. more definit Limits do not sur secher to be binding by Chmin why the persons applying Rejeshy Certifint should be raised $2000 4 persons should be raised from person. worth $5000. I8 17 й stated that the former led to difficulties and and it is undeniable to inden the between Chinese and Britisch inhabitants in matters: ss. 11. expenally as further shirquery is applied which prinder that the marker slige must be a Bürlich muljeit 1 I ask for 244ams se. is 4 ss 3. No dubt this is all night. in 6(1) The Bonding hovor regulations do not to Chinese. We mut I think leave this to be outtled breally.
555 -985. I find huntful whether the fund final yes yes HAL hk B IrFo to this Cy 3f7 pinis Comm be allard. It prohibits a mazishich the cam Henn dabing with the blenging to a given by # Ja forrige 401 foreign ship unless guwandre is the corresponding Coord. that the oraman shall not on the Colung conagurutly hanne a change ? refer this 9(6). The convicted under this metin "the disposal of me Krasen win lo 7.0. point proovisin that a foreign Harm.com "may b placed not appean the Consular Officer" olpiderable without further onfiguurde. If the (as given by the mating al) stated in the Grolience, this might be allowed if a clawn such as M.S.A. LAK the 238 (1) included. But it would be bette to ward the whole ss. 5.7 in §238 of the MSA.
7 ? or anggurt. suction & does not include AkB Tast then wo? corregunding section 17. sulnothin berry to 224 (2) of the MSA engert inclunin I should like to 544 4 imverted to the effect that the plea that A ship is unsavertly shall be a valid the port of any defence changed with desertion or Main en alance with