the now declaration of Lenny yo
and Cheng one eveloved
16378
If, as there suggeted
भू
on proceed us further
of thei
cothing
mr in
cin
16378
in the wettin
cordenne, then is
more the tail aber Holt;
Ostautuar
Arme
353
g the
the fin Ilvingfield's minute on 9720 (at the end) Holt' care
differs from the other in that a withen was produced who said that he had paid bribes to Holt. I think that we must ask for copies of all the domments & consider the case on it ment now that this petition has come, though it is, on account of the above difference, less proper one for favorable cousdentin than the in Wh: no withen be produced to swea
he had actuall pand
mong
Cages
h
this
to the person changed. I think we sh= therefore send a petition to the Governor vask for
fatti
report
*
Holt'
9
way perhaps supag additional resson forsching better the effect that can has been carefully corodives, in the w. Chamberlain repeti
that is
can see no cromad
In interping with the decision
amire an
Mr Lucas
In Swing field So for
the Colonial fort.
4/8
Iean ascertain beyond the statement contained in ho may's report o in 20053/97 (see is 20.043) we do not Kryen th
as regard Holts! case.
any facto
all matinal dowment.
Ав A dept Wr
ed as
suppose we must proceed Cox suggests move aday
C-PL-6
I think waar that the reply ther pelition might be that the late Gromer atten deny in report for host to dismifat stated that the he had practically admitte his fuilt and had made no define whatever in these circumstances, Mr. Chamberlain in unt prepared to reopen the case
Ew shfl
5819 voutly 165/9