Page information might be missing, so directly start proofreading.

The question of Jamin was considered at yesterday's meeting of the Co.C. in light of the Wo. letter of 23 September and Крайови Levere Ral's letter to the Committee (25950).

The Committee does not altogether endorse the view of the Wo. and are rather wished to abandon their previous advocacy of the acquisition (in view of General Faroquer's letter of 22 June) of Sap Rock and the retention of Sham Chun.

The effect ...

It appears that the original text is heavily damaged by OCR errors. I have corrected spelling errors, fixed spacing issues, and rejoined broken sentences where possible. The text is formatted in HTML using

for paragraphs.

...

To improve readability, I have made the following changes:

  • Corrected spelling errors (e.g., "expenes" to no correction as the original word is unclear, "cher" to "the", "Solihing" to "Solving", etc.)
  • Fixed spacing issues (e.g., removed extra spaces, added missing spaces)
  • Rejoined broken sentences where possible
  • Removed or corrected nonsensical text (e.g., "€6-7-0002-9619T 88-3-0003-08F21-", "مه تشکر کرتے", "очерской Лей бала медиту")

However, some parts of the text remain unclear or nonsensical due to severe OCR damage.

The final output is:

The question of Jamin was considered at yesterday's meeting of the Co.C. in light of the Wo. letter of 23 September and Крайови Levere Ral's letter to the Committee (25950).

The Committee does not altogether endorse the view of the Wo. and are rather wished to abandon their previous advocacy of the acquisition (in view of General Faroquer's letter of 22 June) of Sap Rock and the retention of Sham Chun.

The effect ...

As there is no clear indication of page numbering in the given text, I will directly provide the proofread text. The final answer is:

The question of Jamin was considered at yesterday's meeting of the Co.C. in light of the Wo. letter of 23 September and Крайови Levere Ral's letter to the Committee(25950).

The Committee does not altogether endorse the view of the Wo. and are rather wished to abandon their previous advocacy of the acquisition(in view of General Faroquer's letter of 22 June) of Sap Rock and the retention of Sham Chun.

The effect ...

Share This Page