377
pointed out that the right to remove them without compensation
destroys their value as security, should it be necessary to utilize
them for that purpose. I endeavoured to define the expression
"public purposes" but found it impossible to do so in a manner
satisfactory to the owners. At present I do not see any public
purpose for which we should require to remove a pier, save Praya
reclamation, which is already provided for.
4.
I concur in the opinion of the Acting
Attorney General, but as the right of the Crown unquestionably
exists to demand removal of piers without awarding any compensation,
I do not consider myself entitled to surrender this right
without definite authority to do so. I have, therefore, the honour
to request that you will favour me with an early decision on this
matter and that, in view of the desirability of collecting the
increased rents as soon as possible, you will convey to me your
reply by telegraph.
I have the honour to be,
Sir,
Your most obedient
Humble servant,
Govr H.K.
GOVERNOR, H.K.