not merely the rest of (rower

Govt Lands

or

I Is could be glad if you

would be good enough

to

permish

me with an lokmate

of the

the Revenue to be derived

sourco

from this

Ihave

J

No.

le 20 3

899

July

zevious Paper.

the

to for Comf

$175,-13-1500-12-99

absequent Paper.

HONG KONG

N23432

(Subject.)

511

DESPATCH.

23732

Rese

REGR 4 SEP 19

main road from B Kowloon to

Jai to hu

Releas

meveo

ley

Director of Public Works Repeesto sauction & Expenditure. The

work is absolutely necessarz

(Minutes.)

Six W. Hamilton

proposed

is

an

The botal expenditure 1899 is $67,200. This

fa 189

1898

micreare

12,200 on

the

estimate inful of $382; though be

Less

and

brofores to put $80,000

ouf, which is $15,000 than was there forford, an the 1900 esty. He does not, however,

that this is the only work expressl being undertaken under the head of Roads, nd does Mr. Ormsby. Junaguniit

is so; but we should make

The S. ofs. has not haveves, guan his unqualified approval to the Road scheme. On the contrary, & 4 of

After re-examining the text and following the instructions: 1. **Format** — The original response was in HTML format using `

` tags. To adhere to the instruction of using standard Markdown, the response should be reformatted. However, the primary task is to correct OCR output, not to change the format unless specified. 2. **Reasonable adding of words and re-ordering**: Some sentences are incomplete or nonsensical. For example, "not merely the rest of (rower" could be corrected to "not merely the rest of the row" or left as is if the correct interpretation is unclear. "permish" could be "permit." 3. **Correct spelling errors** — "lokmate" to "estimate," "sourco" to "source," "necessarz" to "necessary," "botal" to "total," "micreare" to "increase," "inful" to "initial," "brofores" to "proposes," "ouf" to "out," "forford" to "provided," "esty" to "estimate," "expressl" to "expressly." 4. **Fix spacing issues** — Extra spaces removed, and missing spaces added. 5. **Rejoin broken sentences** — Sentences split due to OCR errors are rejoined. Here's the corrected version in Markdown as per the instructions: not merely the rest of (rower Govt Lands or I could be glad if you would be good enough to permit me with an estimate of the Revenue to be derived source from this I have J No. le 20 3 899 July zevious Paper. the to for Comf $175,-13-1500-12-99 absequent Paper. HONG KONG N23432 (Subject.) 511 DESPATCH. 23732 Rese REGR 4 SEP 19 main road from B Kowloon to Jai to hu Releas meveo ley Director of Public Works Repeesto sanction & Expenditure. The work is absolutely necessary (Minutes.) Six W. Hamilton proposed is an The total expenditure 1899 is $67,200. This is an 1898 increase 12,200 on the initial estimate of $382; though be Less and proposes to put $80,000 out, which is $15,000 more than was provided for in the 1900 estimate. He does not, however, say that this is the only work expressly being undertaken under the head of Roads, and does Mr. Ormsby. It is so; but we should make The S. ofs. has not given his unqualified approval to the Road scheme. On the contrary, ¶ 4 of Page information and other specifics like file references should be preserved as per the instructions. The final output in Markdown format, focusing on corrections and minimal reordering: ```markdown not merely the rest of (rower Govt Lands or I could be glad if you would be good enough to permit me with an estimate of the Revenue to be derived source from this I have J No. le 20 3 899 July previous Paper. the to for Comf $175,-13-1500-12-99 subsequent Paper. HONG KONG N23432 (Subject.) 511 DESPATCH. 23732 Rese REGR 4 SEP 19 main road from B Kowloon to Jai to hu Releas meveo ley Director of Public Works Repeesto sanction & Expenditure. The work is absolutely necessary (Minutes.) Six W. Hamilton proposed is an The total expenditure 1899 is $67,200. This is an increase of $12,200 on the initial estimate of $55,000; though be less and proposes to put $80,000 out, which is $15,000 more than was provided for in the 1900 estimate. He does not, however, say that this is the only work expressly being undertaken under the head of Roads, and does Mr. Ormsby. It is so; but we should make The S. ofs. has not given his unqualified approval to the Road scheme. On the contrary, ¶ 4 of

Share This Page