You for you information a copy of the Regulations a
the subject which
are in
force at Hong Kong, and
which were framed with a
the
new to giving, greatest possible protection
against fraudulent trade-
marker consistent with the
freedom of the port
Jam to request
that the enclosed
Regulations may
be
returned, as this Office has only a few copis
Jamets.
of them.
жас
1073
Office or Individual.
elton, Anderson
rook bo
7
1898
Mich
ast previous Paper.
H
477
Copy corres
to Fr. 81. 31 March 2
HongKong No. 5398
(Subject.)
Trade Marks
DOMESTIC,
469
10:32 93
Asko
for codes of
Mark bedce 155790.
Porenti
out disadvantage under which Englisch Manufacturer lies, augenti alteration of the
Brace
Svi W. Hamilton
(Minutes.)
cannot see the
I really
force of these objections to the Hong Kong Regulations. They
to be a very suitable adaptation of the Regulations made
sreran
by the Authorities at home under the
sary
Act of 1887. We really cannot exfect the Colonial antrosities to go beyond the Imferial Legislature. Messis. Hilton Anderson Brooks & Co.
fraudulent that they do not see how a manufacturer could be touched if, in copying the Trade Mark, he added,' Made in England! I suffose he would beguilty of making a false declaration,
am
the Ondariance
provides that the immunity and has effect if the track mark, the. be accomframed by a definite vidication of the counting
or manufacture + ( §14)..
ext dibsequout Paper. It seems
7824
in whic
such goods were made It seems to me that the case of Portland
section 16 of the Ordinance, Cement is covered by illems. Hilton Cs's Trade
As for the imitation
2o B & Ls (78) ~~$50-10000-19 67