累
く
does not fully carryout the instructions carveyed
J.J
in
my
Ebgram of thell th
of July last, which affeer to have been misunderstood
In first
3
flare, sub-section (4/of section 2 of the Ordey
does not provide with sufficient cleaners that
the deposit is love under
the custody of the
Choral Secretary and the
Colonial Treammer and
not in that of the
Bank. There is of course
the com
noolfiction to the
being keft, as I understand,
is the case, none of
the Bank vaults,
96
parded the key of
that vault
are in the
hands of the Colonial
Treasurer and Colonial
Secretary; but the
Dramanice should
make it clear that
that is the case, and
that the coin is not
within the control of
the Bank itself.
In the second
4.
flace, the Ordinance
does
not embody
embody the
arrangement which was made with the Bank
un 188
1889
with
regard to
the security for their
の
dinary note issie.