If it is consideressential in this case then I wores substitute for the conds underlined "Whether
"British subject
or not
# BC 25afil
I do not think that there is ang
--
las
te vistonal whil authinges the bruishment
Britesh Fabzut from British trritory,
A
It mash meeeping
The Gibraltar
ins the core of a protrus
but I thuild henbute
tadele it in any other Celine that Keeper
it is not likes that mang
in the Shants worth be ratieval born Babish unlyrels
I do not
persille that
یا کہ تم
Cover
Luis
the
Ew
Hirt is pastelse.
subject.
er Ertza
Lordly
cat peturs tous
but I or not
st. draft.
maths this posisin affont insidiosness),
I thrite the Vent
Ar
bardz
+
hrf
bey
d mp
Insert
A
then,
تر
bo fought
rt.
I am
A.
propend clause Empavering
by
A
I buy
noterad tous Babil sobject
shes in place.
Ly
the County
arises it com
am afraid the diffrence. Wtevren the
banishment of any person and The Banishment Adience which exprest
British subjects will. t. noticed and create some cute on in the Colony
Excludes
L
2
is an appropriate mode
111
generally in such manner as may seem ex-
pedient and upon the issuing of such
order the like consequences shall ensue
in all respecta as though such order
had been issued under the powers con-
ferred by "The Banishment Ordinance,
1888".
11.
This clause it will be seen puts
a penalty upon any brothel keeper who
permits a woman suffering from any con-
tagious disease to remain in a brothel
for the purpose of prostitution. I
should hope that by thus putting the
penalty upon the brothel keeper and not
upon the prostitute the effect of clauses
9 and 10 of the Indian Cantonment Regula-
tions of 1897 will be produced in a man-
ner more suitable to the conditions of
Berishment
the Colony and that the result will be
dealing
J
would h
uzy
startling
in the ca
tal aliens but
Britil ful
that the brothel keeper will in self def
Ebs
27 Me
fence send the prostitute who is suffer-
Here I west jus eng. recher relatert
1627/4
ing from disease to the hospital or to
the