D. A-ty" in his Despatch, that I see no
0. A.
rahan
for repeting
of
then. I think he satisfactorily refutes most
liter
all the objections & I do not see that sufficient
reason is shown for reconsidering the precious decis
There is howeva such unanimity of opinion that the premium
paid on leaned Lands will suffer through the policy that I cannot but think that the yo O.A. & is too
hopeful when he
d that the Revenue from
Land, Sules will not be materially affected. I think
ins considering the hexene derivaber from this squa to the next few yours, with a view to the erection
Publi offres
& others pressing works it would
of
847s
"n tarity waper to allow for a uduction of havenue
last para of this Despalth
You with sea from the
that the O.A.G suggests going ung to Publica
extent of allowing Praya Reclamation
hitherts,
part to the
ه
sites to be
on the
leaved for 999 years as
ground
karlmer
ale
that there sites which front the likely
to be occupied by specially substantisch mercantile sites: he would however have
the Crown Reat revised every fifty years_
the following reasons both of whiye appear in the
This is bes
dealt withs
Fot
minutes on 6140, the proposal seems to me
324
A
af
ford one In London many of
the mat Valuabe sites
KAR
berad held
on short leaves, of
reavesemoul
of frown Reuts
thing as a fifty
Ha
COMA
to much the same
years Lease.
It seems
ما
every fifty years,
me that
if
the stipulatives
0.1.G
the 138 33 of
suggested by the O.A.
his Despatch
were to be inserted in all Leases
we should break
the back of all
objections now put forward.
Before coming to a pical decision-
another fu
? Shale
£L (z)--865-2000-12-97 6812-1000-6-GN
we
the
suggest the adopting of this
comme to the you'n I get an expression of
his views
See 25015
now that the is T.C.M.
on the spot.
17/1
I don't think there is any object in
consulting Sei Hy blake
sets out matters so
fully.
other wife J
agres
And
this Despatch
with his macuagh bee
? Reply that Mr Chamberlain has carefully
considered the
Memorials
enclosed in the present
་-ག