G
bited that section of the same and
arist the Police. might be turned agamist
decided not to prosecute, Thermfon it was if the prisoner would accept instant
to do His solicitor induced him loc
dismissal
action
Mo
قله
inconsideration
so; and he was released. For days after a document agreeing tobring clean for false migris comment. of the withdrawal of the britary charge matant dismissal and forfeiture of all persion claris Sets bag's los accepted I be sent in his resignation.
which he
read it as
hein
Henan states that he did not
on
understand the nature of the compromise
signed, that he could not his spectacles had been taken away and were not returned till after he and sigsed the paper. The Governor states, the authority of th. Gedge, the prison. counsel that he fully understor document, which th. G. witnessed; but the
suf of the Gaol admits that th McAllister's spectacles.
not relung d till three days after his afflication for
recured and granted. (That is
them had been
were
suffering Mr. Mat. speaks the birth,
when he says
he afflic
the 18th.)
Mr. Il Allister's petition is not
strong; he has given anythin
decorament which he
Moreover, he has subse
away
the
This case I signing
not understandi
he has subsequent I
sequent resigned. But
Jean' & help thinking that the captain Superintendent of Police played a very
Same, and was
shark infrudence? - guilty of so near the wind of km 4. Setting traps is not a desciable practice,
sailing
mif it
even
justified
sheer necessity
درن
on
fur
the ground it. the U. H. GV. doesjustify
it - and no doubt briky
Cases
His that however t
the draw
want it off
hathwith cara
are hard
-865-2000-12-97
to detect. It might even be contended that the police had broken the law inorder to enforce it; and I think Mr. Mat. has reasonable
clamis to compensation. At rate, the action of the Police censurable.
Sis W. Hamilton
зыл кисто
I think this was
P
A. F
any
questimable pereceding
90
in this part of the Capt. Supt. of Police, and it frame to me that the winter by the ag.) it
near beny
Come
Al
very
infringement of the pensions of 54 of ord. 3 of 1898, my may is finisims to doubt undy to suspect anybody just present, and notannaturally,
h
dening what
has occurred. In this wistance his suspicions were
justified. Except for the unpleasant method adefte)
the man's guilt I see nothing to
for this.
discovery
Call for the Secretary of state; interference. The dicament. which turm'celleiter segured
way
fully explained
to hesi
by
wei counsel, and indeed there uned ham been to defence under the carcans tances. I can't appre not an absolutely clea are, liter
with the ag that the case are han not zit hei opinion.
This secu
uwatupitos
plan
HFW
19/8
care that I think
horougle oben the opinion of
thi
attiget befoe coming bay decision
in the wather,
Iwall art
to frin_? by telegraph, I reeve
five ther be belles cepato
her & cousure hat way.
2018
Т.