Murray Battery in exchange has been rejected by the 6.0-|
the question appears to resolve itself into the two points
alove seferred-
to whith
I have
with regard to for it appears to ma that Mr Ormsly's
raluation of #26, 250 premium
#26, 250 premium and #30,000 capitalised value of Crown Reut
at twenty-five years purchase
is not at all extravagant, & I think we should tell
the
War Office so-
with regard to (2) I think in the first place that Mr Sercombe Smith is wrong in the assertion, which
he attempts to prove at
his
of his
the surrender of the site now in question I understand that she fonte deepling on t
equivalent for lacus
&
ሰ.
Our
Q
not regarded acticadaveicat ambafoming the already surrendund,
by the War Department”, & therefore
it seems to me
the present
to be paid in
carh
and
system on
not
SARLAR
ung or
It doe
importance one
when
4
The Cobaray
that it may fairly claim
not by the book account
decurion
be a
206
matter of great
(a)
the other, provided that the
land she is credited
book account system is fairly kept is provided that
the Colony surrenders aby with it's fair value, and (b) that the book account is periodically
settled up as Mr Smith proposes.
some length in parav 7-14 second memorandum, that a book account
This latter
is
4
propond to which I think
should specially urge
care
the W.O to agree.
not also of lands required for
See also 16088
J.C.M.
10/8
in
corr: with
regard.
to
should be kept only of lands required for defensive purposes and
military purposes; - suice
and
Buildings' it
Wand
the Circular of 9th June 1840 as to the Disposal of Colonial Military Lands agrind
between the War Office and this Dep't that " military purposes and "Defence puspores" were
synonymous
Troops being kept
in this connex In
terms
in Colonies for defensive purposes, and Military requirement in a Colony being therefore for defensive purposes"
See licular of 4th June 1840,
on 18685 9 para: 10
I am
a last para of.
485
9 para: 10 of 4.0 reply yos, -
kowever incháca
La
letter to 6.0
with Mr Sercombe Smith's argument
that the Circular of 1894 (see para 11 thereof, intritts only applies which Colonial Military Lands should be surren
Colonial Gov't,
to the trout c
dered to a
O
Au
equivalent.
+
and to Lands searrendered by the Colony
Die Lucas
I must apotoxin for having kept this paper folong. It Jshnim gan it to me. just be fore
he left, with a pencil minute, which Wt thucnaghte used in writing.
`oan above. I gathered from wrong.
WJohnson that Mr Foxcombe 3 mille was
in his attempt to descriminate betwem defensive
and military purposes, and the crews that their synonymone
in conformed by
the to be taken as the correspondence behore. Cod Wo
+705/91.
44
in 18855/50
aneceray logo. ngth into the clabouty
to the account grown by w sercan be "bwith as preson's negociation's
connection with this site The land to be surrendered by the Colonial Government to agreed upon, and the proposal that the Murray Battery Shored be exchanged fach has been rigseted by the Brilitary
authorities.
What dou not seen.
fair.
to me is that the special
Account between the Military authout and the Coherent foremment phone? Efferently be forced by payment
newtr