:
97
Even if it is true that they signed the Peti-
tion you will notice that the statements of these men differ
widely from that of Wong Pun Tak.
There is little doubt in my mind that the Pe-
tition was set on foot by Stanton.It is evidently drawn by
the person that drew his and Quincey's.
As regards the Petition itself, I have little
to add to what I wrote in paragraph 31 of my report of the
27th.of July last (C.S.0.Confdl.No.40 of 97).
The evidence on which the signatories of the
Petition were dismissed the Force, is contained in Enclosures
T & U of that Report, with the addition in the cases of P.S.
Tang Chung, P.S.0 Mi Cheung and P.C.Yeung Fat of the follow-
3
J
ing-
P.S.Tang Chung
Enclosure K p.p.1,2,3,17 (for entries on the list
H see page 11 of Enclosure N) 20 & 21 (for the entries on
list H referred to on these last two pages see p.p.14 & 15
of Enclosure N) Enclosa, L. (Tang - Tang Chung).
P.S.0 Mi Cheung.
close. N.
Pages 17 & 18 of Enclosure K and page 11 of En-
P.C. Yeung Fat.
Pages 18 & 19 of Enclosure K. Third page (at bottom)
of Enclosure M pages 4,11 (Fat Kun) of Enclosure N.
I have stated in paragraph 32 of my Report of
the