a pond - a pretium
something approaching a pand
charging a comparatives vonial pence w and a conviction and punishment for
wheel there then much gaver offence of
of
the
a
newer accused by the Caffe Superintendent though he had moved heaven and Earth to scrape up some hidrce on wheel he could Min prosecute theme frait-
The action taken in refertest
s the more
alt
remarkable as Levout other Polin oppies me the line acmind of similar offences are the Gruals wong-bone the "fremmes and 2. Conseil unscribe Reguliti and in "The advice of the there cases the form acting 4.ajority of the Cluncil allowed them to repige and assigned them pensions
+
In this remarks on
Meu
a
h
in the absence
Inputer Baker's Memorials
Cot
Here
are dealt This pattant
Paky
Euchar
Mor We May does not attempt to deny that he had
he more says that prejudged the case
of any legal Eindence against the "Could not in the interests of the public service be haught before the thajistite they were dealt with under sechender genes 14 of 2017 in the same
criminal cases in which the manner But many Evidence is not streng Encough to prosecute bepe
magistrate with any hope of success. with lythe Caft." Sup
Bohin I teuch calls for explanation it can scares mean that the Capt. Suft of Police in some way busher persons prits accused of criminal offences which there is as legal worden af their guilt - it such a law exigh in trung hany it is high, in should to hojated special when there is a Capt Superinandent who as Mr Cox, in my
of new met party chews, appears to labeer under incupant & apps the womey principles of solence and fair dieling
κι
In the same remods Mitgleng ties Kishuffle of the responsible upon the Gwerner who canon aut
upon the representation of the (after Superitur n
Stanton in his tremorial alleges that at the Exquing the questions put to the witnapor
7
Lo
leading
a character as
ho
arre
lunger would have ventured to put in a Cast glaw is denied by Mr. May but the hawn bliciter in his remarks on the Petition does not contradict it.-
The conclusion I come to on the question of the in anner in wheel the caus
on a
Startin
de andere wheil
& cinery and Baker have him dealt with in that it is imposite to sustain their dissipal based upon uch a star chamber suquiry. diffrent charge form that on wheil
really dismifich wone new & calle: upon & answer- if
had hen allowed the a fortuner of Concl would have not d'acod & perpettrats such a travel of justice.
they
They
26 M
they
kirre. U
dr. May
Turning
now to the widence on hich the
mhing
Mobley has convided these offrent there is absolutes
no divat cordance against
The list on
G
on which so much reliance in placed was made by Sham In and Sham In dous ast pretend that he knows that any of then Inspecting received a farthing all he can say is that certain Chineres tith him that they had hen sent there Inspectors to demand hush money and or instructed this that he accordingly gave persons to fin
money
day to the Inspectors
Tham in being himself the chief culprit in the gambling business his wordener in tainted and could out he acted on of Caroborated and to in a document which he admits that he kicunly compiled dres and shangthen his wiidence- but as I han said his own wildener amounts to nothing but hearsa
but hearse, based in the statements of men
Faced therefore his endres in
te, une
une corruft
mach
unworthy of credence the ony teer witcepse.