thould not be amended to as
otha way
to proude for
2
desling
with case
of this
huis
18/5
The long field
through
the whole of these papu I have carefully sear Jattack my notes on the caves
theve men
of
sop" Itten to there is power under $24 ofordmance 1/72 154 to dismiss there men het Idon t then I their
which they ought to have
Jav Dismissed
wx vendence
hav acted with the
que
ling.
Jentil I then kellay!
th
+
free
test bra
absolute wilful incapacity to affly the ordinary princ to ha He ought he we fair dea previded at the committee which sat to condu or to have taken (as he admit he did lend who cod not have been and missible in Still he ought he to have, brought pressure withese to five coridence again of there banish mint order or Cancellatia
Cases
17
J
a
Com th to be di
bila
by &
tec
"Ihe ich there wn, no reliable &idence su
wa
justify the dismissal of Stanton or
Quincy
}
showed be setires on their ordinary penses
0
the x
ites
de in Heading
JBC
18
I have already dealt with the natur
the
(a)
}
J
the profes
the
15 may
all the evidence in my the other police constable, in 26:13-
#BL
3
In & Inspecters Stanton Quincey
Sergeant
<
221
auss
J
Baker and Hot have ben dismissed by the Gromer upon the representation the Captain Superintendant under section
of the Police Fedmence
Womance J 18870
Besse
24
making his representation the Captain Infant In perintendent held in inquing in each case in
but
before private before himsely with the Crown Solicitor Letting of
but taking no part in the inquiry before holding
these inquiries Mr. Mag
had completes
made it his mind that all thanks Perfections are
booboo taking
hibes and I ape with that he was absolute disqualified by in that accent from holding
impartial inquiry
Guilty Murton
titr
and I can out rejurd it as a schern fare. and I do not wonder that the Guverner disl not send the depositions and that have only reauth that to me hair here athe to get them in the casus
Stanton and Quincey
1
we have not han how
pot than in the cass & Baker and Stoke-
The charge which this Inspecters were called upen to answer was that of guts neglect of diety in not discorority and in not reporting
have at foz Wa Lane" — but the Sambling Evidence of the principal witness
aud
in Each car
was directed to prove that the accused had hen libel and though they were dis meiped nominally on the ground of pup neglect it is unquestionatti
absoluleg certain that the real ground for this tremendous punishment depriving there men of plusion was that the Sox Capt. Superintendent and the Gormer held their to he quilts & bribery. This again sheer the cupping to have then an utter farce and wore them a farce &
!