onspended by Mr Wingfields directin in
order that
we.
night frist comelt. Sin
Charles Mitchell and the
thang no further
action
taken
LAJ
owing
to
my
three
J
months absence. I spoke to Sir
Sin C
Mickbell last month and he appeared to be strongly opposed to giving wachange compensation gennelly to Natives of India
Ceylm.
On
Winching the mother
further I think
my proposal in
to liberal and will lead to serious
difficulties. The Giving sachings component
remittance privileges at the
in family rate of 24 impeer
J
the
Dame
at 3/ the
ao
$1
h #1 is
in affect
giving exchange compensatin
which is
the rate
to Europeans. The 3/- rachunge
compensation rate is supposed to not -merely to meble
men
their onlaries home
less to
cost
compensate of living the
Jall fiorly give the
to remit a portion
but also
more o
them for the increased the Colony ming
im the
in silver : and
parne
We
Lanm
to
amount of exchange
componention to Indians as to Europeans
--865-2000-12--97 6612-1000-6-98
све
we
shenbel
have Dunand
150
for it funn Einasians and native offiers; and Sin Charles Mitchell in
very
stingly oppond to the extension exchange compensation to Ensations and other natives. On the whole therefore I should like to refere
this
Hong Kong proposal altogether. before the thin edge of the wedge has become thiker
Refuse on the ground
Sug 27 dec.
the
on the ground that it will lead to
in still further demand in thong at it and Expecially tas Straits & Native States where the Indian for fficials
Halsdubor
necessary
are numeune.
small increase
a
q
th
i
of
Phay would be considered if the
Opar
in lieu & What is
proposed
Explain the delay CPC 31
at once
!