It is stated on p. 2 off these Pension Papers that
ale
Pensionable.
on which hur hawdler's first apfit
thek suvicu
I auser 252627
un sulmilton:
X
See alis
15050 & subsequent papers
on which
Can
enquired further
aud
to his apfit. The increase in his pay does not seem mentimes
on 197409 the subsequent papers as to reorganising the
Daft
nor
I have I been
able to find it mantimed in the
Reclamation
Praya Reclamation worl Papers.
you with see it is stated on in the Ordinaren Maya
Ordinance (scelto 3) in 12480 that
89
'The salaries of such
Offices & staff (ighus howelles de).... shall be defrayed part of the cools
the said work.....
Ar
J Ipressume therepe that in sanctioning this ord: we in an measure sanctioned the increase of his boodle's salay.
? Prossed as proposed a love but all ath your to send C.S.0 394 of 1889 referred to within on which it uns decided
J
that his hardle's special afft should count
•ath whether
fassion
the increand Salary aurided to himi
uns ever reported to this Dept.
hi
I am sorry
P.C.M. 9/5
loverlooked this point
in my previous
? Reply
a-
mmit.
in M. Macnaghter's way
first muite, omitting words in [ ],
but adding that befor finally approving
Mon J.. "C.5/0.394%
the rate of to see a ( -5.0.37% wishes to leather
for further infe
As
State 1889
""
da
to the rate of
salarz assigned to W. Bowdlen
Cash
when he was seconded for special duty
ar
the Praza Reel? works, observing that.
ん
1402188
rate
of pay
than $83,360 which
he drew & befor 1889;
Lost whitt
such increase
of pay
clearly 130
might to have been submitted fur the fee of state's approval; dask
whether he was
whole of
promised
that the
his micreased emoluments.
were pensimatle
[Increased pay for a special job
orarily be pensionably) would not necessarily be,
8u9.10/5
X. Hristy
no record can be traced of Infanter pan 19
any report having
been rec
m.s. being then assigned a higher
Follow
? here of
17440/89
Salary
-82182-3000-6-97
21/5
Smp cada ?
think we must have heard about M: Bowdler's salary increase
Salary.
g
Put it that probably it
was reported but that we cannot trace it - otherwise proceed
as
proposed. Let me see draft C.Pd. 21 atonce
Ith
i