10
Badeley's locum tenens is
not to be allowed to draw
the additional salary of $50 ammonth granted to the Deputy Superintendent of
Police in connection with his additional duties as As_ sistant Superintendent of the Gaol . In his despatch N: 162 of the 26th July last
Sir W. Robinson recommend B
ed that Mr. Badeley should not draw this increase of
pay during his leave of
absence
19070
97
401
absence in order that it should
be available for the officer
actually performing those
duties. Mr Howe is now
per-
forming the combined duties of Deputy Superintendent
of Police, Assistant Superintend
ent of the Gaol, and Assist= ant
t Superintendent of the Fire Brigade, at a total sala_ ry of $200 a month (exchange compensation being disal. lowed in his case) and I therefore consider that he
might