gratuity in respect of her
deceased husband's services in that Department.
Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service
2.
on
on her
the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I (4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last,
One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard.
3.
Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and
has been rewritten to meet the requirements as follows:gratuity in respect of her
deceased husband's services in that Department.
Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service
2.
on her
the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last,
One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard.
3.
Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and
However, to follow the exact output format required (HTML usingfor paragraphs), the corrected version should be:
gratuity in respect of her
deceased husband's services in that Department.
Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service
2.
on her
the 11th January, 1897, re-ceived has been corrected to "received" a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last,
One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard.
3.
Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and
The final output is:gratuity in respect of her
deceased husband's services in that Department.
Mrs Nolan on retirement from the service
2.
on her
the 11th January, 1897, received a gratuity of $597 under Rule I(4) of the Pension Minute, the grant of which was formally approved as per your despatch "N:54" of the 17th March last,
One of her sons is employed in the service of this Government as a student Interpreter at a salary of $1,200 per annum, and the other is, as stated by Petitioner, serving as an apprentice in the Naval Yard.
3.
Petitioner's case differs from those quoted in her memorial in that the widows of the officers there referred to, not having been in Government employ, received no gratuity and