Mauritius, Straits & Hongking
are ther
allow it.
only
Colmes which do not
Seeing that is of the wide too In view of 5.4 of Hongkong Ord. 18%
1891
which allows
lamin
offrier
A
continue to contribute in every other contingency,
it Leens
to
Le
service is
illogical not to allow him to continen to contribute where he is transferred another Colmy o Imperial. (In fact in 5.4 of Ord. 18 of 1891 is by itself almost wide enough to
of transfer, Ord.30 of 1890
the case
189
were it not
for
o which rather
contradicts such a reading of the feinen
section).
Mas
we not suggest to for. Etting
arr
ce. And ainending 5.18
Bad
to pass Ord. 30 of 1890
so as to allow what
W. Lethbridge asks, & to make it retrospective?
fur
ses.
It sums a reasonable Proposal - & gore for the Fund
which
igains by muumbus
M8/9
(1) so proved
(2) I think we may support it resema to the Ciglen
Windian ordinances
alume El quef
Men Wes Indian
cer
it
70026
Ped 24 AUP 97
Are
Deputy Jovernors
St.M. Prison
Borstal
Dr Rochester
23th August 1897
352
Page 352
As it appears prom section 18
a) Adinaves No 30 of 1890 that I canush
J continue to contribute to the Any Keny
Widow and
orphaus Fund since I
have been transferred to the English Prison Service, I have the Counts speech that I might be informed
what,
et pate of pursion any widow
would or cutitted to on the amount.
contributect by
The Unden. Secutary of State
Colonial offen Brony Street S. M.
one other Fund.
Here is the revised response in HTML format as requested:Mauritius, Straits & Hongkong
are there
allow it.
only
Colonies which do not
Seeing that is of the wide too In view of 5.4 of Hongkong Ord. 18 of 1891
which allows
lamin
officer
A
continue to contribute in every other contingency,
it seems
to
be
service is
illogical not to allow him to continue to contribute where he is transferred to another Colony or Imperial. (In fact in 5.4 of Ord. 18 of 1891 is by itself almost wide enough to
of transfer, Ord.30 of 1890
the case
189
were it not
for
o which rather
contradicts such a reading of the section).
May
we not suggest to for. Etting
arr
ce. And amending 5.18
Bad
to pass Ord. 30 of 1890
so as to allow what
W. Lethbridge asks, & to make it retrospective?
fur
ses.
It sums a reasonable Proposal - & good for the Fund
which
gains by numerous
M8/9
(1) so proved
(2) I think we may support it resema to the Council
West Indian ordinances
alike
Men West Indian
cer
it
70026
Feb 24 AUG 97
Are
Deputy Governors
St.M. Prison
Borstal
Dr Rochester
23rd August 1897
352
Page 352
As it appears from section 18
a) Adinaves No 30 of 1890 that I cannot
I continue to contribute to the Any Keny
Widow and
orphans Fund since I
have been transferred to the English Prison Service, I have the Count's speech that I might be informed
what,
rate of pension any widow
would be entitled to on the amount.
contributed by
The Under Secutary of State
Colonial Office Downing Street S. W.
one other Fund.