103

3.

... mondigd dooя qua and beffas ad bluow xaT Ianolibbs

whigh dooя qвû add nerw easao bluow ti dadi brB BJAT

and to JToq87 mijadrov A .110 bisq saw stutibasqxs

od JIiw asvig asw sabeiq zidt dołdw robnu BRONAÍBANOTIO

Istened end mort redsel & to yqos baxanna sáð at bakot

:anox snoll 18 vr8391592 Isinofo) and od soremmoɔ to tednad)

8e8i ylut 1308 and betab

ni

13833 two bedrloq osia al 11 metsel Jant al

saɔX groll add yo bawaal nuder Istoitto as ddiw sonsbrooda

TonalJibbe aidd 79bar beaÍCH JUBOMB Ísĵoj ent ,INSMATSVOD

no babasqxe mwa ant bobaasxs bari moj raq sines †I to vvsi

ari159/000 eldan otaqgstgeled edt,samodidglI Xoof quð sdt

Alyauqu va

sonsnejciam 10 Jaoo sit bra gnoX gnok ediw Ji

,90tamm00 te tred:ad) end to estim:o) et bas ,000,0♪ à 10

9d das of bovirta bed smit sad Jerid betaeggua ‚etoterant

ob msilli xiƐ yd nevis sabeiq odd moebat of tremaTØVOD

.gaiqqide no xat Isnoltibha atdi dalloda of hns

• X37ed?

JnomgbeIwondoa 919′′ siid bnoyed,‡sáð ar88qq8 $I

#nanatiovod end yd abæn need aad viger on „‡qisos“ aði 10

bab sad no dud 90ramm00 10 Tedmaɖo add to ma‡daí ads of

+

dquouis) gaoй gnoï ni nwond visifdeg smaosd ti tasi teɗmasal

acw doldw Joeldua aint no esnebnogaertod a to mulbam sit

published in the "China Mail" of that date) that His

Excellency the Governor had, on the 12th November, made a

private communication to the Unofficial Members of the

Legislative Council, to the effect that this additional levy,

if continued, was estimated to yield during the year 1897,

about $ 65,000, and that if it were withdrawn, the official

estimates of expenditure for the year 1897 would exceed

the revenue by that amount. He, therefore, requested

their opinion whether it would be preferable to continue

to levy Light Dues at the total rate of 2 cents per ton,

or to devise some alternative source of revenue in order

to make good the deficiency in the official estimates which

would result if the special charge of 13 cents per ton

were abolished, as suggested by the Chamber of Commerce.

Having regard to the dates of the letter from

the Chamber of Commerce (31st July 1896) and of His

Excellency the Governor's communication to the Unofficial

Members (12th November 1895), it seems unquestionable that

the estimates referred to in the latter must have been

prepared by the Government at a considerably later date

than the question of abolishing the additional levy was

brought to their notice, whilst the financial difficulty

bedaliduq

which

Share This Page